From the
pages of
HEAD COVERING - CUSTOM OR ORDINANCE?
( A Bible study
by brother Tarran Dookie)
Gen.6:6 And when the woman saw that the tree was good
for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to
make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto
her husband with her; and he did eat.
1
Cor.11:1-9 Be ye followers of me, even
as I also am of Christ. Now I praise you, brethren, that ye remember me in all
things, and keep the ordinances, as I delivered them to you. But I would have
you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is
the man; and the head of Christ is God. Every man praying or prophesying,
having his head covered, dishonoureth his head. But every woman that prayeth or
prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all
one as if she were shaven. For if the woman be not covered, let her also be
shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be
covered. For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the
image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man. For the man is not of the woman; but the
woman of the man. Neither was the man
created for the woman; but the woman for the man.
According to 1 Tim.2:14
Adam was not deceived but the woman was deceived. She was the one
who was beguiled by Satan. Notice that it was only after the fall that
Eve is told ‘thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee’.
Therefore Paul declares ‘the head of the
woman is the man’.
What
does head covering depict? It depicts the submission of the woman to the man
even as the man must submit to the headship of Christ. Head covering is about
authority. The woman is not to have authority over the man. In these days of
‘women’s liberation’ this may be difficult for some sisters in Christ to
accept. But we are not dealing with a
mere first century situation but with the eternal word of God. When a woman
puts on a head covering she is saying that she submits to the authority of the
man and ultimately to the authority of Christ. Observe that in 1 Cor.11:3 Paul
does not say the head of the wife is the husband but rather the head of the
woman is the man. Of course the husband is the head of the wife (Eph.5:23). But
Paul in 1 Corinthians 11 is not talking about husband and wife but rather man
and woman. Therefore even the unmarried sister must have a head covering.
The
apostle teaches that if the woman is uncovered it is just as if she were
shaven. Further he states that if she be not covered let her also be shorn.
According to 1 Cor.11:15 the woman’s hair is given her for a covering.
Therefore Paul is saying that if the woman refuses to put on the symbolic head covering she should
shave off the natural covering which is her hair. The woman who refuses to
cover her head is in effect refusing to submit to the authority of God and God
is saying let such an one be shaved, displaying her shame.
Some
contend that the hair is the covering and no other covering is necessary. Let
us examine the passage (1 Cor.11: 1-16) to see if hair is the covering Paul is
referring to. Verse 4 reads ‘Every man praying or prophesying, having his head
covered, dishonoureth his head.’ Am I to conclude that only bald-headed men can
pray aright? If hair is the covering then men must shave their head, since the
passage says that it is a dishonour for the man praying or prophesying to have
his head covered.
Verses 5 to 6 reads ‘But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head
uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were
shaven. For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a
shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered.’ If hair is the
covering then Paul is saying that if the woman be not covered (that is has no
hair), let her also be shorn. Imagine trying to shave a bald-headed woman.
Verse 15 does say that ‘... her hair is given her for a covering.’ However, the
scriptures do not play tic-tac-toe with one another. The woman’s hair is a
covering, not the only covering . Verses 4-6 become highly nonsensical if hair
is the only covering Paul was referring to. Clearly another covering is
required of believing sisters, a symbolic head covering (head wear if you want
to call it that).
Is.14:12-15 How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer,
son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the
nations! For thou hast said in thine
heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of
God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the
north: I will ascend above the heights
of the clouds; I will be like the most High. Yet thou shalt be brought down to
hell, to the sides of the pit. (See also Ez.28:11-17.)
Lucifer,
who was the son of the morning, wanted to be like the most high God and because
of his rebellion he fell from heaven. But Lucifer was not alone for he led
one-third of the angels in this rebellion. These disobedient rebellious angels
were also cast out from heaven. Angels
also disobeyed God when they left their own habitation and married the
daughters of men and giants were born (Gen.6:1-4). Again God punished them for
their disobedience. Angelic disobedience amounted to rebellion against God’s
authority and rule.
Whenever
a woman puts on the head covering she is proclaiming a message to the angels.
She reproves the angels of Satan declaring that she will submit to the
authority of God, even though they did
not. She also causes rejoicing among the angels of God who are obedient and
submissive to the authority of God. Such is the power of the covering on the
head. ‘For this cause ought the woman to have power on her head because of the
angels.’
1
Cor.11:11-15. Nevertheless neither is
the man without the woman, neither the woman without the man, in the Lord. For
as the woman is of the man, even so is the man also by the woman; but all
things of God. Judge in yourselves: is it comely that a woman pray unto God
uncovered? Doth not even nature itself
teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him? But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory
to her: for her hair is given her for a covering.
It
ought to be obvious from what has been discussed so far that the answer to
Paul’s question ‘is it comely that a woman pray unto God uncovered?’ is no, it
is not comely. Paul says a man ought not to have long hair but if a woman has
long hair it is a glory to her. Sisters in Christ should treasure the natural
God-given covering and in the submission that pleases God put on the symbolic
head covering.
Acts
17:16-21 Now while Paul waited for
them at
Both
As
Paul instructs the Corinthians to observe this ordinance of head covering he
was aware that some would argue or be contentious. But he tells them that ‘we
have no such custom, neither the churches of God’. Neither the apostles not the
churches of God entertained the custom of being contentious. Instead they
disapproved of the custom of being contentious. To suppose that the custom of 1
Cor.11:16 refers to head covering is a massive misunderstanding undoubtedly
introduced by the rebellious one himself, even Satan. Paul would not spend 15
verses to establish head covering and in the next verse dismiss it as a custom.
But such is the wisdom of this world.
It is mere conjecture to
suppose that someone wrote Paul about a specific problem and he gave these
instructions as a solution. It is mere conjecture to suppose that women
were praying and prophesying publicly and folks were getting upset and that this was the apostle’s response. The
ordinance of head covering as laid down by the apostle Paul must not be
confused with a custom or culture of the first century. Do you think the Holy
Spirit inspired Paul to write these 16 verses to address a cultural situation.
I repeat: we are not dealing with a first century situation but with the
eternal word of God. I have seen people referring to Paul as a male chauvinist
because of what he said about head covering and the role of women in the
church.
Head
covering has nothing to do with a first century custom. The ordinance laid down
by the apostle has to do with submission to God’s authority. If believers were
to ask their grandmothers or mothers in some cases if women of their day
covered their heads in the church they will tell you that they did. The ladies
in the churches only started to throw off the head covering with the advent of
the women’s liberation movement ( one of Satan’s effective tools).
Let
us recognise that head covering is a divine ordinance to be observed among
God’s children today. Let every sister in Christ have this power on her head.
Let every brother in Christ encourage and admonish his sisters in Christ to
have their heads covered. Let us all submit to the authority of Christ Jesus.
Amen.